CivieBlog

Stewart Mader points us to Sarah Denman's look at the four groups most likely to be involved in a wiki or other enterprise 2.0 implementations. The list is:

• IT
• HR - and no it doesn't include learning or training - it's more the compliance side of HR.
• Business
  
• Executives
  

Obviously, I'm posting because most people reading this will say that learning or training is missing from this list. The responses to Lead the Charge suggested that we should be leading this, but we don't seem to be even involved.

From Masie's recent social learning survey it appears that there is a lot of adoption by learning professionals.

Do you use any of the following technologies in your organization? Choose all that apply

Technologies Used	Percent %
Corporate Collaboration Portal (eg. Sharepoint)	57%
Peer Coaching/Teaching	52%
Media sharing (images, videos)	48%
Collaborative Spaces - Wikis	47%
Blogs	45%
Learning Systems for Social Learning (LMS/LCMS)	42%
Social Networks	41%
Employee Profiles	33%
Content Ratings and Reviews	13%
Twitter and Mobile Content	12%

So I'm not 100% sure I get the disconnect. Why are we not seen as a player when it comes to Wiki or Enterprise 2.0 ownership? How come Stewart and Sarah left us out?